After reading Uncle
Tom’s Cabin, and looking at different essays providing additional context
or critiques on the novel one primary theme that I am most interested is
slavery. Of course the book is all about slavery. But I’m interested in how
slavery is presented and how the different characters in the book react to
slavery and how that in turn affects readers and the message that the book
conveys.
Uncle Tom’s Cabin presents us with
several different depictions of slaves lives. We see positive and negative
situations. Sometimes the slaves are in homes that they like and where they are
treated well. Then suddenly they are ripped away and sold, or parts of their
families are sold leaving them heartbroken and powerless. We see slaves risk
their lives and attempt an escape to the north. Some slaves remain submissive,
others commit suicide instead of remaining in a life of slavery. Some slaves
are touched by the people around them and are given strength. Others are beaten
down and left with almost nothing. Stowe really paints a wide picture of
several different outcomes that happen in slaves lives. You never really know
what life is going to put you through as a slave. Life is constant; it’s not
stable. Stowe made it clear that life as a slave is not easy and day after day life
tests their strength and faith.
Not only
does Stowe show us how slavery effects slaves but she also shows us several
different white families and how they deal with slavery. Stowe shows us several
different families that are in favor of slavery and treat slaves horribly,
families that are anti-slavery and do their best to help slaves, or families
that own slaves but treat them well. What interests me is that each type of
family is still religious and use religion to explain their various viewpoints
on slavery. There’s Christians that use the bible to prove that men are
supposed to own slaves and there’s Christians who believe that if you believe
in slavery you aren’t acting as a good Christian. As I was first reading the
book I was curious as to why Stowe would have characters use religion to defend
both sides of an argument. Stowe herself came from a religious family with
several members of her family being in the ministry. So why would she depict
religion as a force behind slavery and anti-slavery? In the White families the
women are typically the ones preaching religion and the men don’t really have
anything to do with religion. And then among the slaves a majority of them are
faithful. I think this is done to show that the slaves are the ones that are
relying on religion. They need someone to pray to in the hopes that life will
get better for them. White people are not living in terrible conditions and being
treated like animals. It’s hard to read
about characters that are slaves and are repeated being treated poorly but
still try to keep faith. It’s uplifting and as a reader you just want their
prayers to be answered and for them to have a happy ending. When looking at the
white families in comparison you want all of them to find religion and to
realize that owning other individuals is not something that the bible
encourages. Everyone has their own schema for how Christians should act. But I think
most people can agree that, at the very least, today, Christians are good to
almost all people and are kind and respectable. They believe in being good to their
neighbors. Reading UTC today I don’t
understand how people behaved the way they used to and I’m amazed that any
slave was able to hang onto their faith. I think that is a one way UTC can still
be interpreted today. I think it’s easier to look at how religion is presented
in the book today.
Uncle Tom’s
Cabin is an American treasure that helped the anti-slavery moment in the 1800s.
It’s a book that showcases several different characters and their involvement in
slavery. Although the book was incredibly successful in its time, today the
actual depiction of slavery is questioned and to me the book was clearly
written for its intended purpose. I do believe that it is necessary to showcase
events like slavery so that readers are “comfortable enough” reading about the
difficult subject matter. I think today, we deserve to read pieces of
literature that aren’t written for white people or so that it’s “readable”. Literature shouldn’t be written because
readers can’t handle harsh realities. I know Stowe wrote UTC the way she did
because she wanted to convey the message that slavery should be stopped. I’m
not saying the way she wrote it was bad or that she was unsuccessful. I just
think that after reading the book and reading different critiques, that slavery
shouldn’t be sugar coated. Slavery is a piece of all Americans history and is
able to be written by all people, white or black, as long as it is done well
and honestly.
I'm thinking of one of your last comments--about how we need to read literature that is not meant to sugar coat the situation. It's interesting to think about how literature in the 20th century becomes more and more realistic, and how it tackles the ugliness and awfulness of history and contemporary life without the literary flourishes of sentimentality. What factors have contributed to this change? Social change? The conditions of modernity?
ReplyDelete